I wonder why the fuss is being made over organic food’s nutrition quality
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/to-eat-or-not-to-eat/365594/
Per this report, some UK study suggests that organic food is not more nutritious than regular food.
No one eats organic food because it is more nutritious. People (like me) like to eat organic food because it is supposed to be pesticide free. Will someone please explain to the advocates of this study the complete futility of their expensive research?
On a different note, I recently discovered (much to my shock) that some people are using coke, pepsi and other aerated drinks as pesticides on food. It appears that these being more cost effective than regular pesticides, aerated drinks are preferred increasingly by households for domestic use. That certainly puts an end to my ever having any more aerated drinks.
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/to-eat-or-not-to-eat/365594/
Per this report, some UK study suggests that organic food is not more nutritious than regular food.
No one eats organic food because it is more nutritious. People (like me) like to eat organic food because it is supposed to be pesticide free. Will someone please explain to the advocates of this study the complete futility of their expensive research?
On a different note, I recently discovered (much to my shock) that some people are using coke, pepsi and other aerated drinks as pesticides on food. It appears that these being more cost effective than regular pesticides, aerated drinks are preferred increasingly by households for domestic use. That certainly puts an end to my ever having any more aerated drinks.